Legal Opinion

Cathcart v. Comstock

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Lincoln County. The case is thus stated by Mr. Justice Cassoday: “ The facts in this case are, in substance and effect, the same as in the case between the same parties, and in which the opinion is filed herewith [see ante, p. 590], and hence need not be repeated, except in the following particulars, as, in effect, stated by the plaintiff’s attorney, to wit; “ The land covered by the tax deeds, under which the defendant claims title, was…

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Lincoln County. The case is thus stated by Mr. Justice Cassoday: “ The facts in this case are, in substance and effect, the same as in the case between the same parties, and in which the opinion is filed herewith [see ante, p. 590], and hence need not be repeated, except in the following particulars, as, in effect, stated by the plaintiff’s attorney, to wit; “ The land covered by the tax deeds, under which the defendant claims title, was never in the town of Jenny, but was in that part of the town of Texas set off from Marathon county, and was included within…

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, J.

Most of the questions involved in this case have also been determined in a suit between the same parties in which an opinion is filed herewith. [Ante, p. 590.] The reasons for such determination need not be here repeated. The difference in the two cases, and the further question to be decided, arise out of the fact that the lands affected by that action were situated in the town of Jenny, *612which was wholly detached from Marathon and incorporated into Lincoln county, whereas the land here in question was in that portion of the town of Texas which was detached from Marathon and incorporated into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kimball v. Town of RosendaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. State ex rel. Brown County v. MyersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Harrison v. Board of Supervisors of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. May v. HoldridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Warner v. KnoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Milwaukee Street Railway Co. v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Binion, Sheriff v. Oklahoma Gas Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Pratt v. Lincoln CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Thompson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Johnson v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API