Legal Opinion

Kohler Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 3, 1995No. 94-628 TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HODGES, Judge.

This case raises two issues involving Koh-ler Co., a Wisconsin corporation, that otherwise are unrelated: (1) Was Kohler’s foreign subsidiary required to incorporate in Canada so that it could be included in Kohler’s consolidated return pursuant to United States tax laws and regulations; and (2) Was the taxpayer’s income clearly reflected using the Last In, First Out (LIFO) method of accounting when it treated goods purchased at a substantial discount the same as goods later manufactured. The answer in both instances is No.

I

OVERVIEW

A CANADIAN SUBSIDIARY

IRS permits an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Graff Chevrolet Company v. Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. Fox Chevrolet, Inc. (Maryland) v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  5. U.S. Padding Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kohler Co. And Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Greiner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API