DeLaval Separator Co. v. Jones
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Action of trover to recover tbe value of a cream separator delivered the company of which the defendants were trustees in bankruptcy. The separator was delivered to the company under an agreement that the title was not to pass until notes representing the purchase price had been paid. The case was reported to the Law Court upon certain agreed statements and stipulations. Judgment for plaintiff in accordance with opinion. Case stated in opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
This case comes up on the following agreed statement of facts.
Trover for the conversion of a DeLaval Cream Separator. July 13, 1915, plaintiff delivered to said Maine Creamery Association the separator in question upon a conditional sale agreement embodied in three several conditional sale notes payable respectively October 1, 1915, Dec. 1, 1915 and Feb. 1, 1916, of like tenor with the following:
“$200.00 • Bangor, Maine, July 13, 1915.
On the 1st day of October, 1915 for value received, I promise to pay to the order of the DeLaval Separator Company two hundred and no-100 Dollars, with 6 per…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Carey v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Debus v. YatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1910
- In re ChappellDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1901
- Claridge v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beal v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. SpoffordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
- Lambert v. New England Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- In re Merrymeeting Products Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1956