Legal Opinion

Thomaston Cotton Mills v. Rose

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 18, 1933No. 6742PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by a taxpayer to recover upwards of $32,000 which it had paid in satisfaction of a deficiency assessment upon income and profits taxes for the year 1919. From a judgment of the District Court denying the recovery sought, the taxpayer appeals upon the ground that the assessment was prematurely made, and was therefore void.

In 1924, within the statutory period of limitations, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined that the tax deficiency amounted to more than the sum finally collected; but after the limitation had run, acting under a waiver…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Bailey v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Decker v. KorthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  2. United States v. LehighDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1961
  3. Heinemann Chemical Co. v. HeinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
  4. Amicon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  5. Lyddon & Co. (America) Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API