Legal Opinion

Stinson v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1968No. 7005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Justice.

George Jones sued Big Three Industrial Gas & Equipment Co. and Jim B. Stinson for damages for personal injuries arising out of a collision between two automobiles. Big Three appeared and answered. Although served with process, Jim B. Stinson did not appear and answer. Plaintiff Jones took a nonsuit against Big Three and it was dismissed. Judgment by default was rendered against Jim B. Stinson. Jim B. Stinson, as petitioner, prosecutes this appeal by writ of error against George Jones, as respondent. Judgment was entered in the trial court on August 28, 1967. Petitioner filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HennesseyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cragin v. LovellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Griswold v. CarlsonTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. C & H TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. White v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nipper v. U-HAUL COMPANY OF SAN ANTONIO, ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Schieffer v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Lopez v. AbalosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Muhr v. Paramount Pipe & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Ramfield v. WilburnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API