Legal Opinion

Tammy Hesseltine v. Carolyn Colvin

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 26, 2015No. 14-2780PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Circuit Judge.

Tammy Hesseltine applied for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. An administrative law judge (ALJ) found Hesseltine was not disabled because the combination of her mental and physical impairments did not meet the listed impairment under 20 C.F.R. § 404, Subp. P.App. 1, § 12.05C. The Social Security Appeals Council denied Hesseltine’s request for review, and the district court affirmed. On appeal, Hesseltine argues the ALJ failed to sufficiently address whether her impairments medically equal Listing 12.05C. We agree, and remand the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Halverson v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. McNamara v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Shirley Shontos v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. Scott Ex Rel. Scott v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Heino v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brandy Rose Blond v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of SSADistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2026
  2. Cook v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2025
  3. Duvall v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2024
  4. Goodson v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025
  5. Hall v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API