Legal Opinion

United Equities, Inc. v. Mardordic Realty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInvino H. Saypol, J.

Both parties move for summary judgment in this action for declaratory judgment. They agree that their controversy presents a jural question warranting a declaration, that there is no issue of fact and that summary judgment is appropriate, hut according to their respective contentions.

The plaintiff’s motion is granted and the defendant’s cross motion is denied and the counterclaim is dismissed. The plaintiff is entitled to judgment declaring that the true and proper intent of the lease and supplemental lease is that the value of the land demised therein, upon which value the annual rental for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BostwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hartigan v. . Casualty Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Presby v. . BenjaminNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Bovin v. GalitzkaNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. R.L. Association v. . KelloggNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klair v. ReeseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  2. Plaza Hotel Associates v. Wellington Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. United Equities, Inc. v. Mardordic Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. 185 Lexington Holding Corp. v. HolmanNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API