Legal Opinion
Suburban Construction Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided July 28, 1992No. Civ. 90-379-DPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
In this civil action, plaintiff Suburban Construction Co., Inc. (“Suburban”), seeks a declaratory judgment that it is covered by various insurance policies issued by defendants Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) and Sentry Insurance, A Mutual Company (“Sentry”), in connection with claims against Suburban for the contamination of property resulting from a gasoline leak from an underground fuel storage tank. 1 Suburban installed the storage tank at a service station in Greenland, New Hampshire, in 1984.
Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1382.
Presently before…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Prineville Sawmill Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corporation, Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.