Armstrong v. Jackson
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Dearborn Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
Elliott's lessee obtained a judgment in ejects ment against Armstrong for a house and lot in Lawrenceburgh, On the motion of Armstrong, three commissioners were appointed, agreeably to the second section of the act for the relief of occupying claimants of land, who reported the value of the improvements to be 5,000 dollars, and the value of the lot without the improvements to he 400 dollars. This report was set aside, on the ground that the occupying claimant law is unconstitutional, and an habere facias possessionem awarded. Armstrong appealed.
By the first section of this act, if the bona…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v. WheelerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1814
- Bank of Hamilton v. Lessee of DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1829
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ross v. IrvingIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
- Lake Erie, Wabash & St. Louis Railroad v. HeathIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Commonwealth v. GagneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Meshmeier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- March v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.