Legal Opinion

Quinlan v. Matthews

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 24064PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KRAFT, District Judge.

Defendant opposes plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. The desired amendment proposes to add that the cause of action is brought, in the alternative, under the Wrongful Death and Survival Acts of Virginia, Code 1950, §§ 8-628.1, 8-633 et seq., the place of the tort. The objection is based on the ground inter alia, that Virginia law, alleged by defendant to be applicable here, prohibits suits between the estate of a deceased wife and her husband. The original complaint sets forth a cause of action under the Pennsylvania Wrongful Death and Survival…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frederick H. McNaughton v. The New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  2. Snyder v. Dravo Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Cravatts v. Klozo Fastener Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  4. Bella v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matlack, Inc. v. Hupp Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API