Legal Opinion
Zach v. Nebraska State Patrol
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Decided March 21, 2006No. A-05-449PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carlson, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Nebraska State Patrol appeals from an order of the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court review panel reversing the trial court’s determination that the third amended petition filed by Loree Zach, Andrew Zach, Preston Zach, Jordan Zach, Cody Zach, Siera Zach, Ariel Zach, and Parker Zach (appellees) failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to Neb. Ct. R. of Pldg. in Civ. Actions 12(b)(6) (rev. 2003).
*580BACKGROUND
On May 28, 2004, appellees filed a third amended petition in the Workers’ Compensation Court requesting that they be awarded…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weeder v. Central Community CollegeNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Kellogg v. Nebraska Department of Correctional ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Bekelski v. O. F. Neal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Spear T Ranch, Inc. v. KnaubNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Nicholas J. Schmedding v. Tnemec Company, Inc., a Corporation Doing Business in the State of Missouri Mike Bauer, an Individual Bob Agin, an Individual Greg Beck, an Individual Jo Heckman, an Individual Lawrence J. Murphy, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zach v. Nebraska State PatrolNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Zach v. Nebraska State PatrolNebraska Court of Appeals · 2006