Legal Opinion

Windstead v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 6, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2004-0887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case is before me for all purposes including trial. A bench trial was held on July 26, 27, and 28, 2010. Below are my conclusions of law. My findings of fact are made in a separate document.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs are eleven current or former District of Columbia employees and the estates of two former District of Columbia employees who have made claims for disability compensation pursuant to the District of Columbia Comprehensive Merit Personnel System Act (“CMPA”). 1 Defendants are 1) the District of Columbia, 2) Mayor…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rote v. Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
  2. Rote v. Oregon Judicial DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  3. Winstead v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API