Legal Opinion
United States v. Nugent
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 10, 1952No. 28, Docket 22385PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
At the. hearing held by the hearing officer, he did not mention the F.B.I. investigative report; nor did he give a summary .of its contents or reveal the names of the persons who supplied the data described in the report. After defendant’s indictment, be'fore and at the trial the prosecutor refused to produce that report, on the ground that it was “confidential.” See U. S. ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462, 71 S.Ct. 416, 95 L.Ed. 417. 5 When a prosecutor thus withholds such matter, the government must take the consequences, 6 which here come to this; Not having access…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. AndolschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. KrulewitchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. GraysonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Elder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. PackerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.