Legal Opinion
Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Local 7-629, Afl-Cio v. Rmi Titanium Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 12, 2000No. 98-4336PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaughtrey, J., joined by Martin, C.J.,
HILLMAN, D.J. (pp. 886-98), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers’ (OCAW) Union Local 7-629, Kenneth Allen, and a class of OCAW members separated from employment during July and August 1991, advanced a claim for damages under the Worker Adjustment Retraining and Notification Act of 1988 (WARN) against the defendant, RMI Titanium Company. The plaintiffs alleged that by failing to give its employees adequate notice of the layoffs, the company violated provisions of the Act. In response to cross-motions for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Barnes v. GenCorp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Dean A. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLIS-CHALMERS, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Steven Scott Kildea v. Electro-Wire Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Marques v. Telles Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3Cited by6 opinions
- Milan v. Centennial Communications Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
- Sanders v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Siemer v. Comet North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Pollitt v. Roadway Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Michigan Region Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund v. Holcroft, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.