Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Clapper

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2007No. S-06-406Published

1DissentConnolly, J.

I concede that all federal courts of appeals have concluded that either Blakely v. Washington1 or United States v. Booker2 does not require a jury to determine the facts supporting restitution.3 But, under Blakely, I believe that allowing a sentencing court to order restitution without the defendant’s admitting the facts or a jury’s deciding the facts supporting restitution violates a defendant’s constitutional right to have a jury find any fact “ ‘which the law makes essential to the punishment.’ ”4

Although the U.S. Supreme Court has not yet decided whether a defendant has a right to a jury…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API