Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Milam

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1959No. 24571Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION

By HURD, PJ.

I concur in the foregoing opinion of Kovachy, J., and in the judgment of reversal on the ground that under the facts and circumstances, as shown by the record, the judgment of guilty of murder in the first degree is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. The findings of fact of the trial court, to which I wish particularly to direct attention, are contained in paragraphs one and four which read as follows:

1. “It is clear to the Court that the evidence does not disclose beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, Dallas Milam, went to the Buchanan home…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DorisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Whitt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Patton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API