Legal Opinion · Dissent

Frimet v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 2013Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge McCullough.

Respectfully, I dissent. In this case, the Majority considers how the exhaustion of benefits paid in lieu of unemployment compensation under the now-inactive Self-Employment Assistance (SEA) Program Act, Act of Nov. 26, 1997, P.L. 504, 43 P.S. §§ 920.1-920.12, affects a claimant’s eligibility for emergency unemployment benefits.1 I would refrain from deciding this important issue because it is not properly preserved nor competently addressed by this pro se appellant.

The claimant’s Statement of Questions Involved sets forth the following for our…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. UngerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. McCall v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API