Legal Opinion

Simpson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 10, 1987No. BJ-453PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZEHMER, Judge.

Appellant, Vaughn R. Simpson, complains that the written grounds for imposing a sentence in excess of the sentencing guidelines are improper. Because we find *62four of the five grounds given by the trial court to be legally insufficient, we reverse.

In case 85-6497 appellant was tried before a jury and found guilty of armed robbery, attempted first degree murder, and use of a firearm during an armed robbery stemming from an incident which took place on June 12, 1985. In case 85-6411 appellant pled guilty to armed robbery and aggravated battery arising out of an incident on June 14,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. MischlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Swain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Campos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API