Simpson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ZEHMER, Judge.
Appellant, Vaughn R. Simpson, complains that the written grounds for imposing a sentence in excess of the sentencing guidelines are improper. Because we find *62four of the five grounds given by the trial court to be legally insufficient, we reverse.
In case 85-6497 appellant was tried before a jury and found guilty of armed robbery, attempted first degree murder, and use of a firearm during an armed robbery stemming from an incident which took place on June 12, 1985. In case 85-6411 appellant pled guilty to armed robbery and aggravated battery arising out of an incident on June 14,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- State v. MischlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Swain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Campos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993