Stover v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Conway Chancery Court; Joe T. Rogers, Chancellor; 1. There is absolutely no proof that the judgment disallowing the claim was procured by fraud, misrepresentation or other unfair advantage by the administrators, the attorneys or any one else connected therewith. The undisputed proof is that no one interested in the case tate of Carl Meier, deceased, knew of the disallowance by the probate court until the January following.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Conway Chancery Court; Joe T. Rogers, Chancellor; 1. There is absolutely no proof that the judgment disallowing the claim was procured by fraud, misrepresentation or other unfair advantage by the administrators, the attorneys or any one else connected therewith. The undisputed proof is that no one interested in the case tate of Carl Meier, deceased, knew of the disallowance by the probate court until the January following. The whole theory of appellee is that the judgment should be set aside and the case reopened because she did not know of the disallwance in time to enable her to…
1Opinion of the Court
"Wood, J.
This appeal is from a decree of the ciiancery court of Conway County, reopening and setting aside a judgment of the probate court of Conway County disallowing a claim of $2,000, which the appellee sought to have probated and allowed by the probate court. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff (appellee here) was the owner and holder of a check given her by Carl Meier in the sum of $2,000, which remained unpaid, and which she presented to the administrators for approval and payment, which was refused. She then presented the check to the probate court of Conway County, and that court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- Scott v. PennSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
- Vanness v. VannessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Scroggin v. Hammett Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
- Waldo v. ThweattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. Oil City Iron WorksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931