Legal Opinion

Jelly v. Pieper

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Coicrt. — Hon. James E. Withrow, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

The defendant is the owner of a rook quarry on a lot adjoining Carr Lane street in the city of St. Louis. He made an excavation on the lot about eighteen or twenty feet deep, which extended to the line of the street. On the night of the twentieth of August, 1887, plaintiff’s horse fell into this excavation from Carr Lane street. The animal was so injured by the fall, that it had to be killed. In this action the plaintiff sued for its value, and he recovered a judgment for $87.50. The defendant has appealed.

The negligence, which was stated in the petition, and upon which'a recovery was had,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Jansen v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Flynn v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  5. Norton v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wells v. Henry W. Kuhs Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Wells v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Skinner v. StifelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API