Legal Opinion
McComb v. Dessau
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 10, 1950No. 9173-YPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The second amended complaint seeks to enjoin the defendants from violating the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. More particularly, it is sought to enjoin them from violating Sections 15(a) (2) and 15(a) (5) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 215(a) (2) and 215(a) (5), which relate to the payment of the minimum wages provided in the Act and the keeping of records required by the Act.
There is no denial that the wage scale of the defendants does not conform to the Act, — especially as it relates to the payment of overtime. None of the records required to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Roland Electrical Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reich v. Gateway Press, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Jacques De Gorter, and Suze C. Degorter, as Individuals and as Co-Partners, Trading as Pelta Furs v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Tipton v. Bearl Sprott Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1950
- Reich v. Gateway Press, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994