Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Keltz
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.
Ordered that this motion by defendant Carlo Acosta for an order pursuant to CPLR 3212 dismissing the complaint, the motion by defendant Reginald Puckett, M.D. (motion sequence No. 003) for an order pursuant to CPLR 3212 dismissing the complaint, and the motion by defendant Martin Keltz, M.D. (motion sequence No. 004) for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and 3212 dismissing the complaint are consolidated here for disposition. The motions are granted to the extent indicated below and are otherwise denied. The cross motion by plaintiffs for an…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Tobin v. GrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Johnson v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Morejon v. Rais Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Tenuto v. Lederle Laboratories, Division of American Cyanamid Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tillman v. GoodpastureSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- Donovan v. Idant LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009