Legal Opinion

Hopewell Gardens, Inc. v. Town of East Fishkill

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn P. Donohoe, J.

This motion for a judgment dismissing the amended answer herein in the above matter on the grounds that said amended answer fails to state a defense and that said amended answer has no merit as a matter of law is denied. Defendants’ cross motion for an order (1) denying plaintiff’s application in its entirety, and (2) granting defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint herein for lack of merit pursuant to CPLR 3212, is granted.

In this action for a declaratory judgment, the plaintiff sues to declare unconstitutional the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of East Fishkill,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rose v. City of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berenson v. Town of New CastleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API