Ebling Brewing Co. v. Porter
Emergency Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Judge.
These two complaints have been consolidated for hearing and disposition. No. 180 is based upon an order of the Price Administrator denying a protest against Amendment No. 2 to Maximum Price Regulation No. 259 and Order No. 2 thereunder. No. 261 is based upon an order denying a later protest against Revised Maximum Price Regulation No. 259, which incorporated Order No. 2 by reference. The consolidated proceeding relates to the maximum prices for complainant’s beer product sold under the brand name “Ebling’s Special Brew Premium Beer”. This product had been introduced by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- Pfeiffer Brewing Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- Ambrosia Brewing Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roupp v. WoodsEmergency Court of Appeals · 1949
- Bell v. FlemingEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
- Electromatic Distributors, Inc. v. ClarkEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
- Allied Oil Corp. v. TurneyEmergency Court of Appeals · 1948