Legal Opinion

Ebling Brewing Co. v. Porter

Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 1946No. Nos. 180 and 261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGRUDER, Judge.

These two complaints have been consolidated for hearing and disposition. No. 180 is based upon an order of the Price Administrator denying a protest against Amendment No. 2 to Maximum Price Regulation No. 259 and Order No. 2 thereunder. No. 261 is based upon an order denying a later protest against Revised Maximum Price Regulation No. 259, which incorporated Order No. 2 by reference. The consolidated proceeding relates to the maximum prices for complainant’s beer product sold under the brand name “Ebling’s Special Brew Premium Beer”. This product had been introduced by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Pfeiffer Brewing Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Ambrosia Brewing Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roupp v. WoodsEmergency Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Bell v. FlemingEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Electromatic Distributors, Inc. v. ClarkEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Allied Oil Corp. v. TurneyEmergency Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API