State v. Iosue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
By indictment, defendant was charged with the crime of assault in the second degree, in that he did on a specified date wil-fully and feloniously attempt forcibly to ravish and have sexual intercourse with the prosecuting witness. He moved to quash the indictment for reasons which we shall later relate. The following factual background is deemed helpful to our consideration and determination of the problems presented:
On October 12, 1944, the grand jury was investigating a charge that defendant had committed the crime of rape on September 26, 1944. Having learned of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Commonwealth v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- Christianson v. Mille Lacs Land & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. PenkatySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. HohenwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.