City of Dawson v. Bolton
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bussell, 0. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) In our opinion the court erred in overruling the defendants’ demurrer, and for that reason the merits of the proceedings upon the hearing were nugatory.
We will first consider the question as to whether the with-' drawal of certain of the signers of the petition, addressed to the' mayor and council, asking that Lee Street be paved, is permissible. It is alleged that a sufficient number of original petitioners for paving have reconsidered and asked to have their names withdrawn from the original petition for paving, which originally embraced…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Valdosta v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Walthour v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Matthews v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Collier v. City of BarnesvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Menke v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951