Legal Opinion

Laughlin v. Eicher

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 13, 1944No. Misc. 71Published

1Opinion of the Court

145 F.2d 700 (1944)

LAUGHLIN

v.

EICHER.

Misc. No. 71.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia.

Decided November 13, 1944.

Mr. James J. Laughlin, of Washington, D. C., petitioner, pro se.

Mr. O. John Rogge and Mr. Joseph W. Burns, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, and Mr. Philip R. Miller, Special Attorney, Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and STEPHENS, MILLER, EDGERTON, and ARNOLD, Associate Justices.

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to reinstate counsel in a trial. James J. Laughlin,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Nye v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Brown v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API