Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Rondon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 1999No. 98-3141Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCope, J.

On point two of the motion for postcon-viction relief, the denial order should be reversed and the cause remanded for a hearing under State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996).

Defendant-appellant Julio Angel Rondon entered a guilty plea in case number 96-14410, as well as violation of probation charges in three other cases.*

With respect to the 1996 case, the motion for postconviction relief asserts:

On May 27, 1997, which was the date the defendant entered his plea of guilty, trial counsel informed the defendant the state’s attorney’s office was offering a plea bargain of fifteen (15) years…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LerouxSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Simeton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Rensoli v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Regan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API