Legal Opinion
State v. Dailey
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 27, 2000No. WD 57496PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.
Appellant, Monte Dailey, was found guilty after a jury trial of failure to return to confinement. § 575.220, RSMo 1994. Appellant waived counsel at trial and represented himself. However, Appellant requested appointment of counsel for assistance in preparation of his motion for new trial. The trial court denied his request. No motion for new trial was filed.
The facts are not in dispute. From 1987 until May 28, 1997, Dailey was continuously incarcerated. Early in 1997, he was approved for transfer to the Kansas City Community Release Center (Center) to serve the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- White v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smiley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. ANDREW J. SALES, JR., AppellantMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025