Legal Opinion · Dissent
People v. Rappuhn
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 1977No. Docket 26501Published
1DissentBronson, P. J.
The majority reverses because of what it views as an inadequate asportation instruction. I would hold that the instruction given was adequate to inform the jury of this requisite element of kidnapping.
The trial court instructed the jury as follows:
"In order to find the defendant guilty of kidnapping, you must find as a matter of fact that the element of asportation was present. Asportation as defined is a movement from one location to another. In order to find the defendant guilty of kidnapping, this asportation of the victim or the complainant must have an independent significance.”
Defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Loper v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. KreggerMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.