Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Matthew L.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Concurrence
PORTLEY, Judge,
specially concurring.
¶ 23 I concur that the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the motion to terminate Father’s parental rights based on the standard of review.
¶24 Arizona’s current economic and budget conditions have created hardships for A.D.E.S., Child Protective Services and its case managers. Budget cuts have reduced resources and personnel in a time when more and more children are at risk and child welfare caseloads are rising. The work is hard and demanding; just trying to meet the statutory demands and paperwork from the time a child is removed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- James H. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005