Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Matthew L.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 2, 2010No. 1 CA-JV 09-0141Published

1Concurrence

PORTLEY, Judge,

specially concurring.

¶ 23 I concur that the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the motion to terminate Father’s parental rights based on the standard of review.

¶24 Arizona’s current economic and budget conditions have created hardships for A.D.E.S., Child Protective Services and its case managers. Budget cuts have reduced resources and personnel in a time when more and more children are at risk and child welfare caseloads are rising. The work is hard and demanding; just trying to meet the statutory demands and paperwork from the time a child is removed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. James H. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API