Legal Opinion

Medina v. Sandstrom

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 13, 1980No. 80-1212PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

384 So.2d 927 (1980)

Luis MEDINA, Petitioner,

v.

Jack SANDSTROM, Director, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Respondent.

No. 80-1212.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 13, 1980.

Essen & Spiegel and Eric B. Feldman, Miami, for petitioner.

Janet Reno, State's Atty. and Stephen V. Rosin, Asst. State's Atty., for respondent.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL PEARSON, JJ.

2Per curiam

The petitioner, charged with crimes punishable by life imprisonment, was denied bail by the trial court upon a finding that the proof of guilt was evident and the presumption was great. See Article I §…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stansel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Bardina v. SandstromDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Primm v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. James v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  5. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Valdez-Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. State v. BroomDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Zuchel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Kinson v. CarsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API