Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Jerry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 8, 1972No. A-16547Published

1ConcurrenceSimms, Judge

(specially concurring):

Torbett v. State, Okl.Cr., 487 P.2d 357 (1971), leaves one with the false impression that on retrial after a successful appeal from a conviction, the defendant cannot, under any circumstances, be given a greater sentence than that which he received at the first trial. Such a construction is clearly contrary to the express language of North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969) which Judge Bussey cites in his opinion.

In stating the issue to be decided in Pearce, supra, Justice Stewart analyzed:

“ * * * We turn, therefore, to consideration…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Torbett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API