Legal Opinion

Bremer v. Mohr

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1972No. 9110PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Chief Judge.

Nine subcontractors, as plaintiffs, brought this action to obtain judgment against defendant Hamlin, the original contractor, and to enforce such as mechanics’ liens against certain premises owned by defendants Mohr. Chapter 429; Civil Rule 101. 1 Two subcontractors received judgment by stipulation, and defendants Mohr have appealed from the judgment as entered on verdicts in favor of the other seven. Defendant Hamlin has not appealed.

In his verified lien account, and in Count VIII of the petition, plaintiff Hudson described the items of materials and work furnished by him…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Roy F. Stamm Electric Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Chambers v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Dyer v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Haley v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. Hertel Electric Company v. GabrielMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Seven Palms Motor Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Robinson v. St. John's Medical Center, JoplinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Dockery v. MannisiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. JR Meade Co. v. Forward Construction CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. HeimMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API