Legal Opinion
Citizens' Trust & Savings Bank v. Falligan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 2, 1925No. 4377PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the bank, brings error to review the judgment obtained against it by the defendant in error for the sum of $10,000 with interest thereon from September 29, 1921, and costs. The action was brought against the bank and Otis P>. Berry, its cashier. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was defrauded of $20,000 by certain persons alleged to be swindlers, and that said Berry, in his capacity as cashier and manager of the branch bank of the plaintiff in error, of Hollywood, and while acting within the scope of his employment,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Taylor v. . Commercial BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Kinnear Mfg. Co. v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
- First Nat. Bank of Manistee v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Crawford v. Boston Store Mercantile Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Citizens' Trust & Savings Bank v. HerrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. Plantsville Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1945