Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Tate
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 16, 1939No. 12806PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The sole, question for determination in this case is whether the court erred in refusing an injunction. The case was not decided on demurrer or motion, as was true in several of the cases cited by counsel for the executors. Irvin v. Bond, 41 Ga. 630; Jeter v. Barnard, 42 Ga. 43; Green v. Allen, 45 Ga. 206; Johnson v. Flanders, 65 Ga. 691; Daniel v. Columbus Fertilizer Co., 96 Ga. 775 (22 S. E. 904); Gaines v. Gaines 116 Ga. 475 (42 S. E. 763); Hamrick v. Prewett, 174 Ga. 895 (164 S. E. 678). Nor did the pleadings or the evidence show such…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bacon v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Aiken v. ArmisteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Macon & Western R. R. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Fisher v. Georgia Vitrified Brick & Clay Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Gaines v. GainesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mayor of Athens v. Mu Beta of Chi Omega House Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1963