Green v. Barker
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from tbe district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J. References: Mattis v. Boggs, 19 Neb., 698; United States v. Bonthem Colorado Goal & Toum Go., 18 Fed.
Read the full summary
Error from tbe district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J. References: Mattis v. Boggs, 19 Neb., 698; United States v. Bonthem Colorado Goal & Toum Go., 18 Fed. Rep., 273; Abbott v. Omaha Smelting Go., 4 Neb., 418; Morrill v. Taylor, 6 Neb., 242; Doody v. "Vaughn, 7 Neb., 31; Robinson v. Mathtbich, 5 Neb., 255; Irving v. Brownell, 11 111., 402; Gity of St. Louis v. Qorman, 29 Mo., 593; Sioux City & P. B. Co. v. Washington County, 3 Neb., 41; Murphy v. Lyons, 19 Neb., 691; McGavock v. Pollack, 13 Neb., 535; Williams v. Lowe, 4 Neb., 396; Atkins v. Atkins, 9 Neb., 202;…
1Opinion of the CourtHakbison, J.
The defendants in error instituted this, an action of ejectment, in the district court of Douglas county against the plaintiff in error. The petition filed was as follows: “And now come said plaintiffs and for cause of action against said defendant say: That said plaintiffs, as tenants in-common with said defendant, have a legal estate in, are the owners in fee, and entitled to the immediate possession of the undivided interests hereinafter appearing of the following described real property, to-wit: The block or tract of ground known as the Stone Quarry Reserve, in the city of *937Grandview,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Moffat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Murray v. HobsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Anderson v. BartelsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Whittlesey v. HoppenyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stenberg v. State ex rel. KellerNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Johnston v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Marysville Investment Co. v. HolleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897