Legal Opinion

Poltz v. Curtis

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1833PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action of replevin. The defendant moved for judgment as in case of nonsuit, for the default of the plaintiff to bring the cause to trial, pursuant to a notice of trial given by the plaintiff. In answer to the motion, it was objected that in this action, both parties being actors, the defendant cannot move for judgment as in case of nonsuit, except in the case specified in the revised statutes, viz. “ where neither party shall have noticed the cause for trial.” 2 R. S. 530, § 46. The objection was sustained by the court; the Chief Justice observing that the proper course of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Potter v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Schroeder v. KohlenbackNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1858
  3. Williams v. BlauveltCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1842

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API