Legal Opinion

Blitz v. Fields

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer, J. Bill by Louis Blitz against Lorenzo D. Fields, impleaded with Michael Schuh, to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

On June 6, 1892, defendant Fields owned certain land in the city of Detroit, described in complainant’s bill, and on that day entered into a contract with defendant Schuh for erecting a building thereon. In August following, complainant, as subcontractor, furnished to said Schuh labor and material to complete the house under the contract, to the amount of.$118.43. Complainant’s work began August 20th and terminated August 25th. It is claimed by complainant that, within 10 days after the completion of the work, he served on defendant Fields a detailed statement of the goods so sold. This is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smalley v. Ashland Brown-Stone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fairbairn v. MoodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hoon v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Netting Co. v. BerkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Blitz v. FieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Mayer v. NemethOhio Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API