Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Prieto

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 30, 2015No. 2015AP279-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceHagedorn, J.

¶ 17. (concurring). I agree with my colleagues that the circuit court appropriately exercised its discretion in ordering witness exclusion under these circumstances. I further agree with the conclusion that the State's request for what is effectively a new common law exception for discovery violations by the State is misguided and unfounded in the law. I write separately, however, because I believe this case can and should be decided on narrower and firmer grounds.

¶ 18. I would resolve this case on the legal grounds proffered by the circuit court, which expressly based its sanction on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API