Legal Opinion
Aubin v. Fudala
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 1, 1983No. Nos. 83-1147 thru 83-1150PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREYER, Circuit Judge.
The legal questions that plaintiffs and defendants raise in their cross-appeals in this “civil rights/tort” case are for the most part rooted in the facts and the evidence produced at trial. That is to say, the answers to the parties’ legal claims — e.g. that the district court should have given certain instructions, that it should have directed verdicts on certain issues but not others — can be determined only by a study of the record. We have conducted that study and we conclude that the judgments of the district court should be affirmed. This opinion, rather than…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Rose Bordanaro v. John McLeod Appeal of City of Everett, Edward Connolly, and Donald BontempoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Hector Santiago v. Paul J. Fenton, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- James Earle v. Robert BenoitCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Scott Peckham v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co., Scott Peckham v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Tatro v. KervinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.