Legal Opinion

Nobles v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1929No. 1141-5091PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

Plaintiffs in error, as “beneficiaries” under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (articles 8306-8309, R. S. 1925) procured an award of “compensation” as for death of a minor son, consequent on injuries received in alleged course of employment in alleged service (“for hire”) of Magnolia Petroleum Company (insured). Defendant in error, insurer, gave requisite notice (section 5, art. 8307), and brought suit to vacate the award. Plaintiffs in error recovered as for “compensation.” On appeal this judgment was reversed and judgment was rendered for the insurer. (Tex. Civ. App.) 1 S.W.(2d) 451.

If young…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Holland v. NimitzTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Oilmen's Reciprocal Assn. v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. NoblesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. McCurryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Texas Reciprocal Ins. Ass'n v. StadlerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1942
  3. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Petroleum Casualty Co. v. BristowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. HilderbrandtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API