In re Sweet

In one of the opinions delivered in this case it was said that:

“The relator was not removed from any position. He was properly and legally appointed to the position of special agent for three months, and at the expiration of his term the state commissioner of excise declined to make an absolute appointment. * * * We are of opinion that the relator has not been removed from a position or employment within the meaning of chapter 821 of the Laws of 1896, and hence that the order should be affirmed, with costs.”

The above quotation shows what was intended to be decided. In the opinion referred…