Legal Opinion

South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Ihnatiuk

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 24, 2003No. Not in sourcePublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari from an opinion of the Court of Appeals affirming the family court’s termination of petitioner’s parental rights. Petitioner’s appeal in the Court of Appeals was filed pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), and he was allowed to proceed without payment of costs.

Counsel for petitioner has now filed a motion to be allowed to proceed without costs in this Court. Counsel states that petitioner is indigent and cannot afford to bear the costs of continuing to pursue his appeal by filing a petition for a writ…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Re Exhaustion of State Remedies in Criminal & Postconviction Relief CasesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. McKennedySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Ex Parte CauthenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. HicksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API