Legal Opinion
Lords v. Lava Hot Springs State Bank
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 1927No. 4717PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Plaintiff, respondent and cross-appellant, a married woman, brought this action against appellants, Lava Hot Springs State Bank and H. W. Henderson, for conversion of a crop consisting of 850 bushels of wheat and 15 tons of hay. At the close of all the evidence, each party moved for a directed verdict. The court directed a verdict for plaintiff for the value of the wheat. Defendants appeal from the judgment. Plaintiff, by cross-appeal, assigns as error the failure of the court to direct a verdict in her favor also as to the value of the hay.
On November 1, 1921, A. B. Cheney and wife, owners…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McMaster v. EmersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Reeves & Co. v. SheetsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Christianson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- St. Croix Boom Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Broughton v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States National Bank v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1929