Legal Opinion

United States v. Hall

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided July 22, 1957No. 3539PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWINFORD, District Judge.

On May 21, 1957, the grand jury at Bowling Green returned an indictment charging the defendants under 18 U.S.C.A. § 371 with a conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C.A. § 1010. The defendants were not before the court and process was issued for their appearance. On the following day, May 22, the defendants and their attorneys appeared in open court. The court fixed bond for their appearance and by agreement of the parties the case was assigned for July 8, 1957, for arraignment.

On July 8, 1957, the defendants appeared before the court with their attorneys and entered a motion…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PalermoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. United States v. GradoDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
  3. Raslyn McDaniel v. McDonald's Restaurants of Michigan, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  4. State v. Napier, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API