Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wilkinson v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1996No. 48A04-9603-CR-88Published

1DissentRiley, Judge

The majority, relying on Sharp v. State,2 holds that the State may amend an information on the day of trial as long as the amendment does not affect a defense which was already available to the defendant under the original information. I do not believe the Sharp test for determining prejudice from a last-minute amendment of the charges is so limited. A defendant’s ability to defend himself may also be substantially prejudiced where, as here, the State amends the charges to give rise to a potential defense the defendant could not have been prepared to pursue. For that reason, I must dissent.

Whe…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Owens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Barnes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Todd v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API