Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 24, 1994No. 93-3060PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Affirmed. Appellant’s argument upon the first point on appeal is not persuasive. As for the second point on appeal, although neither party called to our attention the trial court’s statement at sentencing that it had ordered, received and reviewed a PSI, our search of the record reveals such. The trial court’s consideration of the PSI satisfied section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes (1991), which, under the facts of this case, required due consideration of the criteria set out in section 921.005(1). See Mancini v. State, 593 So.2d 1122, 1124 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mancini v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Continental Ins. v. Kinney System, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API