Legal Opinion

Game Fish Comm. v. Talbott, Auditor, Etc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 10, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Drury, Commissioner

Affirming.

The game and fish commission (hereinafter called the commission), unable to agree -with the auditor, relative to its rights regarding “The Game & Fish Protection Fund,” instituted this action under the “Declaratory Judgment Act” (chapter 83, Acts of 1922, sec. 639a-1 et seq., Ky. Civil Code of Practice) for a determination thereof, and, having been unable to get what it regarded as due it, has appealed.

This which is taken from chapter 25, Acts of 1932, and is found on page 199 thereof, is the storm center of this controversy:

“Section 50.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowman v. HamlettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Graham v. JewellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Gross v. Fiscal Court of Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Smith v. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. Alvey v. BrighamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Johnson v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API