Sullins v. Burry

There can be no doubt that the undivided interest of a partner in tangible property of the firm may be seized upon execution by a separate creditor of one of the partners.

Nikon & Chatfield v Nash & Atkinson, 12 Oh St, 647.

While the interest acquired under such levy and sale might not be of great value, depending upon the condition of the partnership business and the amount of its property and indebtedness, yet that interest is one which will be protected by the law and it can only be taken from the purchaser by appropriate proceedings known to the law. The patent and fatal defect in the…